Please call them 'userfunctions'.
Please call them 'userfunctions'.
Can I please ask people to get in the habit of calling the rombot addons, "userfunctions" instead? That will reduce confusion for some newer members who get confused between the game addons and rombot addons. That's the original reason why I asked Administrator to change the folder name to 'userfunctions'. Thank you.
- Please consider making a small donation to me to support my continued contributions to the bot and this forum. Thank you. Donate
- I check all posts before reading PMs. So if you want a fast reply, don't PM me but post a topic instead. PM me for private or personal topics only.
- How to: copy and paste in micromacro
________________________
Quote:- “They say hard work never hurt anybody, but I figure, why take the chance.”
- Ronald Reagan
Re: Please call them 'userfunctions'.
I think what might add to the confusion is when you name your function file it needs to be called addon_ so anytime someone d/l a function they see the file name as addon_ .
Remember no matter you do in life to always have a little fun while you are at it 
wiki here http://www.solarstrike.net/wiki/index.php?title=Manual
wiki here http://www.solarstrike.net/wiki/index.php?title=Manual
Re: Please call them 'userfunctions'.
Yeah Lisa but I think we cant afford to change that now! It' too much hassle!
Thanks for reading! 
Some of you might find this useful: RoM-bot Wiki
User Functions Repository (and other useful files): Addon Repo
Latest SVN updates: SVN updates
Some of you might find this useful: RoM-bot Wiki
User Functions Repository (and other useful files): Addon Repo
Latest SVN updates: SVN updates
Re: Please call them 'userfunctions'.
Nah not saying to change it, just saying that part of the confusion would come from there =)
Basically anything that goes in rom/interface/addon folder should be classed as an addon, anything we do for rombot should be classed as a userfunction.
Exactly as rock5 said =)
Basically anything that goes in rom/interface/addon folder should be classed as an addon, anything we do for rombot should be classed as a userfunction.
Exactly as rock5 said =)
Remember no matter you do in life to always have a little fun while you are at it 
wiki here http://www.solarstrike.net/wiki/index.php?title=Manual
wiki here http://www.solarstrike.net/wiki/index.php?title=Manual
Re: Please call them 'userfunctions'.
It would have been nice if, when changing the folder name, Administrator changed the file name to, to something like "uf_userfunctionname.lua". I think "userfunction_userfunctionname.lua" might have been too long.
I'm not suggesting we change it. All I'm asking is for people, especially the big forum contributors, to remember to call userfunctions "userfunctions" so that when noobs read the forum it clear to them which is which.
I'm not suggesting we change it. All I'm asking is for people, especially the big forum contributors, to remember to call userfunctions "userfunctions" so that when noobs read the forum it clear to them which is which.
- Please consider making a small donation to me to support my continued contributions to the bot and this forum. Thank you. Donate
- I check all posts before reading PMs. So if you want a fast reply, don't PM me but post a topic instead. PM me for private or personal topics only.
- How to: copy and paste in micromacro
________________________
Quote:- “They say hard work never hurt anybody, but I figure, why take the chance.”
- Ronald Reagan
Re: Please call them 'userfunctions'.
Maybe the Userfunctions sub-forum should be called "Userfunctions, Waypoints,..." instead of "Addons, (...)"?
Thanks for reading! 
Some of you might find this useful: RoM-bot Wiki
User Functions Repository (and other useful files): Addon Repo
Latest SVN updates: SVN updates
Some of you might find this useful: RoM-bot Wiki
User Functions Repository (and other useful files): Addon Repo
Latest SVN updates: SVN updates
- Administrator
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5353
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 4:21 pm
Re: Please call them 'userfunctions'.
We could change it, but allow the current convention for compatibility reasons. Anyone against doing this?
Re: Please call them 'userfunctions'.
Great idea! Change but allow both! Also, change the sub forum while you're at it!
Thanks for reading! 
Some of you might find this useful: RoM-bot Wiki
User Functions Repository (and other useful files): Addon Repo
Latest SVN updates: SVN updates
Some of you might find this useful: RoM-bot Wiki
User Functions Repository (and other useful files): Addon Repo
Latest SVN updates: SVN updates
Re: Please call them 'userfunctions'.
I guess it's easy enough to allow for backward compatibility.Administrator wrote:We could change it, but allow the current convention for compatibility reasons. Anyone against doing this?
But what do you intend to change it to?
- Please consider making a small donation to me to support my continued contributions to the bot and this forum. Thank you. Donate
- I check all posts before reading PMs. So if you want a fast reply, don't PM me but post a topic instead. PM me for private or personal topics only.
- How to: copy and paste in micromacro
________________________
Quote:- “They say hard work never hurt anybody, but I figure, why take the chance.”
- Ronald Reagan
- Administrator
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5353
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 4:21 pm
Re: Please call them 'userfunctions'.
Doesn't mater to me, as long as it's something many people can agree upon.rock5 wrote:But what do you intend to change it to?
Re: Please call them 'userfunctions'.
I'd say "uf_somename".Administrator wrote:Doesn't mater to me, as long as it's something many people can agree upon.rock5 wrote:But what do you intend to change it to?
Thanks for reading! 
Some of you might find this useful: RoM-bot Wiki
User Functions Repository (and other useful files): Addon Repo
Latest SVN updates: SVN updates
Some of you might find this useful: RoM-bot Wiki
User Functions Repository (and other useful files): Addon Repo
Latest SVN updates: SVN updates
Re: Please call them 'userfunctions'.
Actually on second thought maybe it wouldn't matter if they were called
After all you wouldn't be having to type it often or anything.
Code: Select all
userfunction_name.lua- Please consider making a small donation to me to support my continued contributions to the bot and this forum. Thank you. Donate
- I check all posts before reading PMs. So if you want a fast reply, don't PM me but post a topic instead. PM me for private or personal topics only.
- How to: copy and paste in micromacro
________________________
Quote:- “They say hard work never hurt anybody, but I figure, why take the chance.”
- Ronald Reagan
Re: Please call them 'userfunctions'.
Agreed, you never have to do anything with the file name, only matters what is inside the file. File name should let you know what is inside but that's about it.rock5 wrote:Actually on second thought maybe it wouldn't matter if they were calledAfter all you wouldn't be having to type it often or anything.Code: Select all
userfunction_name.lua
So I would probably go with userfunction_name.lua
Remember no matter you do in life to always have a little fun while you are at it 
wiki here http://www.solarstrike.net/wiki/index.php?title=Manual
wiki here http://www.solarstrike.net/wiki/index.php?title=Manual
Re: Please call them 'userfunctions'.
Whatever, use both if you will! Some people are just lazy like me and prefer to type uf_ instead even if it is only once! xD
Thanks for reading! 
Some of you might find this useful: RoM-bot Wiki
User Functions Repository (and other useful files): Addon Repo
Latest SVN updates: SVN updates
Some of you might find this useful: RoM-bot Wiki
User Functions Repository (and other useful files): Addon Repo
Latest SVN updates: SVN updates